I was watching TV and came across a show about the possibility of finding "
life" on other planets.
It got me thinking about the controversy over defining when a human baby becomes alive. For some reason this seems to be a big issue for people in determining the ethics of abortion.
At the 2 extremes, those on the anti abortion "
Pro Life" side argue that life begins at conception. On the far "
Pro Choice" extreme, they argue that a child is not actually "
alive" until it takes it's first breath outside the mother's body and therefore, believe it or not, they think it is acceptable to abort a pregnancy up until the moment of birth- for ANY reason.
I for one believe that life begins at conception and going back to my opening sentence in this post, I offer this scientific justification. If we were to send a probe, rover, whatever, to another planet (Mars for example) and it was to dig up even one lone single celled organism, the headlines in every news program and paper in the world would read "
Life Found On Mars!". It wouldn't say "
Random mass of cells that's definitely not alive found on Mars!" it would just say
Life.
Personally I'm staunchly Pro Life. I'm also Agnostic, so the Judeo-Christian arguments in the Pro Life / Pro Abortion debate don't factor in for me. I do however believe in science, and from a scientific viewpoint I think the definition of Life is pretty clear in my mind.